De-Risking a Battery-Materials Supply Strategy
CHEMICALS & MATERIALSMIXED-METHOD6 MIN READ

De-Risking a Battery-Materials Supply Strategy

Through supplier and expert research, Zapulse helped a materials company map concentration risk in the battery-materials chain and identify where to secure supply.

Published February 2026Enterprise · Global7 Weeks · N=260 + 30 experts

01. The Challenge

A Growth Bet on a Fragile Chain

Our client, a materials company scaling into battery materials, faced a fast-growing market built on a concentrated, volatile supply chain. Leadership knew raw-material access, not technology or capital, could be the binding constraint, but had no clear map of where concentration risk actually sat or how to secure supply.

In battery materials, the binding constraint is often access, not ambition. You can't de-risk a chain you haven't mapped.

They needed research that mapped concentration and volatility across the battery-materials chain and identified where localisation, alternative chemistries or recycling would most reduce risk.

02. Our Approach

Mapping the Chain Where the Risk Lives

Zapulse ran a 7-week mixed-method programme combining supplier research with an expert network to map concentration risk across the chain.

01

Supplier Survey

Surveyed 260 suppliers and processors across four material classes on capacity, geography, pricing volatility and lead times.

02

Expert Network Interviews

Engaged 30 specialists on chokepoints, alternative chemistries, recycling maturity and geopolitical exposure.

03

Chokepoint Synthesis

Triangulated to rank chokepoints by concentration and volatility, and to identify the highest-impact de-risking moves.

03. Research Methodology

Research Methods Deployed

Quantitative Survey

A structured instrument fielded to 260 suppliers and processors covering capacity, geography, pricing and lead times across four material classes.

Expert Network Interviews

In-depth interviews with 30 materials and supply-chain specialists on chokepoints and alternatives.

Concentration & Volatility Modelling

Modelled concentration and price volatility per node to locate the true chokepoints in the chain.

Expert Validation

Findings pressure-tested with battery-materials and supply-chain experts before delivery.

04. Key Findings

Where the Chain Is Most Fragile

01

Risk Concentrated in Processing, Not Mining

The tightest chokepoints sat in processing and refining rather than raw extraction, reframing where the client needed to secure position.

"

Zapulse showed us the chokepoints weren't where we assumed. We refocused our supply strategy on processing, and on recycling as a real hedge.

VP, Supply Strategy

02

Volatility Was Chemistry-Specific

Price and supply volatility varied sharply by material class, arguing for a differentiated rather than uniform sourcing strategy.

03

Recycling Was a Real Hedge

For two material classes, recycling maturity was far enough advanced to serve as a genuine supply hedge, not just an ESG story.

05. The Results

From Exposure to a De-Risked Supply Strategy

A Chokepoint Risk Map

Delivered a ranked map of concentration and volatility across the chain, giving leadership a clear de-risking agenda.

Supply Strategy Refocused

Redirected securing efforts toward processing chokepoints and recycling hedges, rather than a uniform sourcing push.

A Repeatable Risk Framework

Delivered a concentration-and-volatility model the client can re-run as the chain and geopolitics evolve.

06. Client Perspective

In Their Own Words

"

Zapulse gave our supply strategy a map it never had. We now secure position where the chain is actually fragile, and treat recycling as the hedge it really is.

VS

VP, Supply Strategy

Enterprise · Global

Ready To Achieve Similar Results?

Partner with our expert research team to unlock growth opportunities in your industry.

Request Custom Research